M asks what I think of the political alliances of the Democratic Party after this election of Deputies.
I think first that the Democratic Party should be talked about. Obvious, you say. But perhaps not as obvious as you think. In fact there was a time when so far the issue has been addressed in an organ of the party as usual, in fact, parties: discussing, perhaps arguing, and finally voting. One day he dines with Vendola, and the afternoon said that the tam tam it will make the primaries, so that the alliance has already been done. Now, I wonder: where did this happen? Who decided, to whom? I, for one, do not agree, and maybe it is the only one, the last Japanese who would like to do as in 2008 (Di Pietro separately). But I would at least have the satisfaction of being able to express my point of view in a canonical location of the party, without having to rely on courtesy - not always disinterested - newspapers. Bersani account that places the item on the agenda of the next direction.
I believe that we must build an alliance of government. That is, an alliance that can deal with a reasonable degree of cohesion problems that the world, Europe and the Italian company put us on the morrow. An alliance that has the same views on the mission in Afghanistan, for example. I've shared ideas on maneuver back the debt that the European institutions supposedly enjoins us to do a little here.
having the same degree of indignation at the attacks suffered in the past months by the Secretary of the CISL Bonanni. That is capable of expressing the same solidarity to the police and the same condemnation of the violence of Roman yesterday. What to do in unison that five one thousand decimated by the government one of its flags. Etcetera, etcetera, etcetera, and yet.
On this, I believe that today there is a reasonable degree of harmony with much of what is called the third pole. And much less attuned to alleged allies of today and maybe tomorrow, as the record shows almost every day. I know the objections. He argues that Fini's right, Casini is the center, we are more left of center.
I think it's an old registry office politics, that to which you cling. If you try to make alliances based on "how we" might as well jettison the Democratic Party. If you do not want to jettison our party, we need to build alliances because of the affinity of the membership present rather than past. In these times I hear another objection. He argues that the third prong has lost its battle in parliament and therefore the Democratic Party has lost in going back to the third prong.
I am not convinced. Not because we almost won, reads as a bit 'optimistic a part of us. But why just holding parliamentary schema Berlusconi tells us once again that too large a part of the country continues to consider it too far, too prone to drift to the left, too much like how you were in '94 ("you were" I written right) in order to break through those parts.
There is one point of truth in that claim. We played cards in parliament that we carefully covered in the country. We are confident that we have to do things step by step, with a caution of the past, and that taking a little 'zig zag, buscando the east to west and covering up our route we will arrive at the finish line without suffering too much of each other's crisis identity. Here is the error.
The alliance, for me, it does so with a certain degree of clarity, I would say even with a brutal ability to speak clearly and face the storm that may come. Keep it covered and protected, like a hothouse flower, makes it more weak, and exposes some risks even more.
Exactly as the Cav has shown us the other day to House. And how we would do well to learn quickly too.
0 comments:
Post a Comment